Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has emerged as a robust force, demonstrating resilience amidst financial crises when compared to other forms of private capital flows. A notable instance is the stability displayed by East Asian countries during the global financial crisis of 1997-98, underscoring the unique advantages of FDI in turbulent economic times.

One of the primary advantages of FDI lies in its multifaceted contributions to host countries. It acts as a catalyst for technology transfer, fosters competition in domestic markets, facilitates employee training, and generates corporate tax revenue. Importantly, FDI is recognized for its stability, proving less susceptible to sudden reversals often witnessed in short-term capital flows.

Economists advocate for free capital flows across borders, citing several theoretical advantages such as risk reduction, global integration benefits, and the mitigation of government policy risks. These factors underscore the essential role FDI plays in fostering economic development on a global scale.

Empirical evidence, as highlighted in studies like Bosworth and Collins (1999), reinforces the positive impact of FDI on domestic investment. It suggests that FDI exerts a more potent influence than other forms of capital inflows, further emphasising its significance in economic growth.

However, a nuanced perspective is crucial, as cautionary elements come into play. The share of FDI in total inflows may be disproportionately high in riskier countries or those with weaker institutions, raising concerns about potential vulnerabilities in the host nation. 

Additionally, the transfer of control associated with FDI may not always benefit the host country, particularly during crises, or due to issues like adverse selection and excessive leverage. The stability of FDI itself may be questioned, given the intricacies of financial transactions and the potential risks associated with intercompany debt, which can lead to reversals.

In light of these complexities, policy recommendations become imperative. Developing countries, in particular, should focus on enhancing the overall investment climate, encompassing both domestic and foreign capital. This approach ensures a comprehensive risk assessment and management strategy that takes into account the potential downsides of FDI in specific contexts.

In conclusion, while economic theory and empirical evidence overwhelmingly support the positive impact of FDI, a nuanced and balanced view is essential. Recognizing the unique advantages of FDI, policymakers must prioritise measures that improve the investment climate for all forms of capital. By doing so, they can harness the benefits of FDI while mitigating potential risks, thereby fostering sustainable economic development in an increasingly interconnected global landscape.